Legal Opinion

In Re Dissolution of First State Bank of Correll

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 10, 1939No. 32,172PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 288 N.W. 709. Cashman (referred to in the pleadings as petitioner) appeals from an order denying his blended motion for amended findings or a new trial. We shall refer to the parties as plaintiff and defendant and to the involved pleadings as complaint, answer, and reply.

Plaintiff, a judgment creditor of the First State Bank of Correll, in August, 1937, instituted proceedings pursuant to 2 Mason Minn. St. 1927, § 8025, to have the court order an assessment against the stockholders of the bank. He alleged that the bank was closed March 3, 1933, since which date it "has transacted…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ogrosky v. Commonwealth Electric Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  2. McCabe Brothers Co. v. Farmers Grain Supply Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  3. Shearer v. ChristySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  4. Miller v. AhnemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  5. Doely v. BensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bolsta v. BremerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  2. Cashman v. BremerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API