Legal Opinion
Vickodil v. Com., Ins. Dept.
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 8, 1989No. 842 C.D. 198PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARRY, Judge.
Before the Court are preliminary objections to William and Jean Vickodils’ original jurisdiction complaint 1 against the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Insurance Department (Department); its Director of Liquidation James Lewis; Kramer Capital Consultants, Inc. and Paul Sweeney in their capacities as the Department’s specially appointed deputy rehabilitators of Northeastern Fire Insurance Company (Northeastern Fire); Northeastern Fire employees Hugh O’Brien and Paul Tyahla; 2 and Scor Reinsurance Company (Scor).
The complaint arises from the following underlying facts. The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Sinn v. BurdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Balshy v. RankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ario v. Ingram Micro, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Foster v. Mutual Fire, Marine & Inland InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Grode v. Mutual Fire, Marine & Inland InsuranceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Koken v. Legion InsuranceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Koken v. Colonial Assurance Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.