Legal Opinion
United States ex rel. Caruso v. Zelinsky
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 22, 1982No. Nos. 81-2395, 81-2484PublishedCited by 100 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SEITZ, Chief Judge.
The State of New Jersey appeals from the district court’s order conditionally granting Dominick Caruso a writ of habeas corpus. This court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1976).
I
On June 4, 1972, Caruso and Michael De-Santo ran amok in Elizabeth, New Jersey, indiscriminately threatening and shooting black men whom they came across. Both men were indicted and charged with twenty-three crimes relating to their June 4 activities, including one count of murder, eight counts of assault and battery with intent to kill, and four counts of atrocious…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Engle v. IsaacSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Sumner v. MataSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by100 opinions
- Missouri v. FryeSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Ex Parte LemkeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- United States v. William Day, A/K/A William McNeilCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Michael Leslie BlaylockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Phillip Griffin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.