Chad Grady v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BYE, Circuit Judge.
When a material dispute of fact prevents a district court from entering summary judgment on an affirmative defense raised by the government in a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 proceeding, the court must conduct an evi-dentiary hearing to resolve the dispute. In the present case, the district court neglected to resolve whether Chad Grady’s § 2255 motion was timely filed, yet the court later granted relief, concluding that Grady’s constitutional rights were violated when he appeared for two hours before a jury venire panel in jail clothes. On appeal, the government contests both the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Eric A. Moore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Anthony Wilson Kingsberry v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Chad Everette GradyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Michael Montez Porchia v. Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Price v. PhilpotCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- John Taylor, Jr. v. James BrownCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Elliot Ray v. Marc ClementsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Dwight Thomas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Ingram v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.