Ingram v. Jones
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BAUER, Circuit Judge.
Prisoners Edward Ingram and Malcolm Rush appeal their respective district courts’ decisions denying their petitions for writs of habeas corpus. 1 Both Ingram and Rush filed their notices of appeal more than 30 days after their judgments. In this consolidated appeal, we asked the parties to address appellate jurisdiction in light of Fed. R.App. P. 4(c)(l)’s language that an inmate’s notice of appeal “is timely if it is deposited in the institution’s internal mail system on or before the last day for filing,” although both Ingram and Rush admittedly failed to affix…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Gaines v. LaneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Fernando Ceballos-MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Chad Grady v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Kenneth N. CraigCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
3Cited by29 opinions
- Thomas Hurlow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Steven Johnson v. Brian FosterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Meraz-Camacho v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- David Bentz v. Marcus HardyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Stanley Felton v. Lebbeus BrownCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2025
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.