People v. Grimble
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BOREN, J.
—The sole issue presented on this appeal is whether the trial court has a mandatory duty to order on its own motion a supplemental probation report prior to resentencing after a remand from the Court of Appeal. We hold that the trial court has discretion to proceed on the previous probation report and find that there was no abuse of discretion in the instant matter.
Procedural Background
In 1980, appellant was convicted of one count of kidnapping (Pen. Code, § 209, subd. (b)), three counts of robbery (Pen. Code, § 211), and one count each of rape (Pen. Code, § 261, subd.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. RojasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- People v. WebbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- People v. BradyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- People v. MagillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- People v. WareCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. StringhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- People v. BullockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- People v. TatlisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- People v. GoldsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- People v. BullockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994