Legal Opinion

People v. Webb

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 14, 1986No. Crim. 14125PublishedCited by 44 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

*404Opinion

SPARKS, J.

This case poses two questions. The first is whether a supplemental probation report is mandatory upon a remand for resentencing when the defendant is ineligible for probation. Parting company with our brethren in the Fifth District, we hold that it is not. The second is whether defendant can challenge his plea bargain on appeal on the ground that it violates the prohibition of Penal Code section 1192.7. For a variety of reasons we hold that he cannot.

This is the second time defendant Larry Lloyd Webb has been before us on appeal. The first appeal followed defendant’s sentence…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. People v. OrinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. People v. StanworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. In re GriffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. People v. BrawleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. People v. PowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. People v. SeniorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. People v. BegnaudCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. Marin Ass'n of Public Employees v. Marin County Employees' Retirement Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. County of Sacramento v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1987

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API