Legal Opinion

Guernsey v. Froude

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 23, 1900No. Appeal, No. 55PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal, No. 55, Jan. T., 1900, by plaintiff, in suit of J. W. Guernsey against W. O. Froude and Mrs. Wm. Froude, from judgment of C. P. Lackawanna Co., March T., 1899, No. 72, on verdict for defendants. Opinion by Orlady, J. Assumpsit. It appears from tlie récord that this was an action based upon a lease for a piano. The case turned on the fact of an alleged parol agreement entered into at the time of the execution and delivery of said lease.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 55, Jan. T., 1900, by plaintiff, in suit of J. W. Guernsey against W. O. Froude and Mrs. Wm. Froude, from judgment of C. P. Lackawanna Co., March T., 1899, No. 72, on verdict for defendants. Opinion by Orlady, J. Assumpsit. It appears from tlie récord that this was an action based upon a lease for a piano. The case turned on the fact of an alleged parol agreement entered into at the time of the execution and delivery of said lease. The facts connected with the circumstance are sufficiently set out in the opinion of the court. Plaintiff submitted among others the following points :…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

by Orlady, J.,

The plaintiff, through a salesman, placed a piano in the home *409of the defendants under such circumstances as to result in their executing a lease, which provided for its hire and ultimate purchase. Under this lease a judgment for $350 was entered against them, and four days later the defendants presented their petition to the court of common pleas for a rule to open the judgment, etc. After a hearing the rule was made absolute, and under an agreement of counsel an issue was framed, on the trial of which the principal contention was in regard to an alleged parol agreement,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GeradeAllegheny County Court of Oyer and Terminer · 1891
  2. Coyle v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882
  3. Bitner v. Boone, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County1889
  4. Taylor v. PaulSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  5. Duncan v. ShermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Estate of GrossmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Snyderwine v. McGrathSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Sharp v. BehrU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1902
  4. Italo French Produce Co. v. ThomasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  5. Becker v. Buffalo & Lake Erie Traction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API