Legal Opinion

Sharp v. Behr

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania

Decided August 12, 1902No. 22PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Equity. Hearing on bill, answer, and proofs.

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHBALD, District Judge.1

In September, 1891, the defendants were the owners of a garnet mine on what was known as the “Lancaster Farm,” in Delaware county, Pa., and the plaintiff, who was their superintendent, had acquired a similar mine on the Fulton farm, adjoining. Both mines were in operation, the one by the defendants, themselves, and the other by a tenant, who was in possession under the plaintiff, paying royalty. In order to control both mines and have the plaintiff’s undivided interest and services, Mr. Herman Behr, one of the defendants, approached him with a proposition to buy the *866F…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Huggins v. DaleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1900
  2. Ray v. West. Penna. N. Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  3. Aye v. Philadelphia Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  4. Koch's & Balliet's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
  5. Lyon v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1855

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Soaper v. KingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  2. Taylor v. Kingman Feldspar Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Wandell v. JohnsonMontana Supreme Court · 1924
  4. American Sulphur Royalty Co. v. Freeport Sulphur Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  5. American Sulphur Royalty Co. v. Freeport Sulphur Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API