Legal Opinion
In re Class Action Appeal of Kelly
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 26, 1997No. Nos. 3466 C.D. 1996, 3 C.D. 1997, 11 C.D. 1997, 15 C.D. 1997, 273 C.D. 1997, 274 C.D. 1997, 275 C.D. 1997, 276 C.D. 1997, 372 C.D. 1997, 868 C.D. 1997PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LORD, Senior Judge.
These appeals from orders of the Delaware County Court of Common Pleas upholding certain decisions of the County Board of Assessment Appeals (Board) were consolidated for review and disposition. In each of those decisions the Board denied the respective petitioners’ requests to act as representatives of a putative class of similarly situated persons challenging their 1995 real property tax assessments.
There are ten putative classes, comprised of homeowners from various developments and communities in Delaware County, con*174sisting of as few as three and as many as fifty-seven…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- DiLucido v. Terminix International, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Hanson v. Federal Signal Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Hoover v. WelshSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Gamble v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
3Cited by4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. YinglingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Niemiec v. Allstate InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Niemiec v. Allstate InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Venosh v. Henzes, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2014