Legal Opinion

Fuhrman v. Wilmington Sav. Fund Soc'y, FSB (In re Fuhrman)

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided December 18, 2018No. Case No. 17-21073-dob; Adversary Proceeding Case No. 17-02109-dobPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Daniel S. Opperman, United States Bankruptcy Judge

Introduction and Background

The Court has before it a joint motion brought by Defendants Wilmington Savings Fund Society and Rushmore Loan Management Services for Summary Judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 made applicable to this bankruptcy proceeding by Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 7056. Plaintiff Eric Walter Fuhrman's Amended Complaint seeks avoidance of the mortgage and disallowance of the claim owed to Defendants and alleges violations of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, 12 U.S.C. §§ 2601 - 17,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  3. Philip Berryman v. Dean Rieger, C. Kukla, Diane HolzheuerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  4. Sanders Confectionery Products, Inc. v. Heller Financial, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  5. In Re Billie Lamont Gardner, Debtor. Terryl A. Gardner v. United States of America, and William H. Zimmerman, Jr., TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Skymark Props. Ii, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019
  2. Swink v. Federal National Mortgage AssociationUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API