Legal Opinion

State v. Callahan

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 18, 1986No. 8616SC665PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

By assignments of error numbers 1 and 2, defendant contends that he is entitled to a new trial because the trial court required him to proceed pro se without clearly finding that defendant intended to proceed without the assistance of counsel.

G.S. 15A-1242, in full, provides as follows:

A defendant may be permitted at his election to proceed in the trial of his case without the assistance of counsel only after the trial judge makes thorough inquiry and is satisfied that the defendant:(1) Has been clearly advised of his right to the assistance of counsel, including his right to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Justices of Boston Municipal Court v. LydonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. United States v. MandelCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
  5. United States v. Richard Virgil Bibbero, Jr., United States of America v. James Paul MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. LarrimoreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  2. State v. StanbackCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  3. State v. FrederickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  4. State v. LambCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  5. State v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API