United States v. Richard Virgil Bibbero, Jr., United States of America v. James Paul Marshall
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HARDY, District Judge:
Richard Virgil Bibbero, Jr. and James Paul Marshall were convicted in a jury trial of various drug smuggling charges. On appeal, they raise issues concerning proof of the alleged conspiracy, non-disclosure of relevant information held by the government, and admission of certain evidence. We hold that defendants were entitled to disclosure of certain additional material held by the government and that hearsay testimony of a co-conspirator was erroneously admitted. For these reasons we reverse and remand.
I. FACTS
The evidence, considered in the light most favorable to the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Greene v. MasseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Justices of Boston Municipal Court v. LydonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by144 opinions
- Lockhart v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. TarantinoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Leo BishopCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Janice Wallace, United States of America v. Elmore PennCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. FernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
139 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.