Louisiana Southern Ry. Co. v. Anderson, Clayton & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RUSSELL, Circuit Judge.
The appellee, who, by our opinion, 1 lost the fruits of the victory and judgment it had obtained in the trial Court, strenuously-insisted by motion for rehearing that our determination that there was, in the trial Court, no serious effort to establish the liability of the defendant-carrier as a common-carrier at common law evidenced a miscon ception and was erroneous. In support of this contention, appellee procured from the trial Court an order directing the transmittal of specified supplemental record to this Court to clarify the “difference [which] has arisen as to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. RankinSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Bank of Kentucky v. Adams Express Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Reider v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Hall & Long v. Railroad Cos.Supreme Court of the United States · 1872
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Northern Pacific Terminal Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1953
- Yeckes-Eichenbaum, Inc. v. Texas Mexican Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- Yeckes-Eichenbaum, Inc. v. Texas Mexican Railway Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1957
- Textile Distributors, Inc. v. Roadway Express, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1965
- Ill. Cent. Gulf R. Co. v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.