Legal Opinion

Minkap of California, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 19, 1961No. Reap. Dec. 10033; Entry No. 15916, etcPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement, consolidated at the trial, involve ladies’ sweaters, exported from Japan during the period from June 1957 through December 1957.

One group of sweaters is composed of yarn, consisting of 25 per centum silk and 75 per centum lamb’s wool, in 15 different styles. Another group is composed of yam, consisting of 20 per centum Angora and 80 per centum lamb’s wool, in 6 different styles. The third group is composed of yam, consisting of 100 per centum lamb’s wool, in 1 style.

The merchandise was obtained from three different sources of supply: The first…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Robinson v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  2. United States v. National Carloading Corp.United States Customs Court · 1961
  3. Sandoz Chemical Works v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  4. Luria Steel & Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  5. United States v. American Agar & Chemical Co.United States Customs Court · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Minkap of California, Inc. ex rel. Frank P. Dow Co.United States Customs Court · 1962
  2. General Wool Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  3. Millmaster International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  4. Standard Brands Paint Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  5. Minkap of California, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API