Legal Opinion

Standard Brands Paint Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided February 13, 1969No. R.D. 11628; Entry No. 66 207632PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wilson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement is limited by plaintiff to the 804 pieces in three sizes of lauan wood shutter doors, as shown in the invoice, which were manufactured by Toyo Door Industries (hereinafter Toyo) of Tokyo, Japan. This merchandise was-exported on July 19,1965 from Yokohama, Japan, 'by Allied Trading Co., Ltd. (hereinafter Allied) of that city, the importer’s exclusive agent in Japan.

Counsel stipulated that this merchandise is not listed on the so-called Final List, 93 Treas. Dec. 14, T.D. 54521, and that the proper basis for appraisement is export value, as defined…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. National Carloading Corp.United States Customs Court · 1961
  2. National Carloading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  3. United States v. Minkap of California, Inc. ex rel. Frank P. Dow Co.United States Customs Court · 1962
  4. General Wool Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  5. Minkap of California, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rattancraft of California v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  2. Amerimex Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API