Legal Opinion
Troy v. Rutgers
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided June 20, 2001Published
1Opinion of the Court
774 A.2d 476 (2001)
168 N.J. 354
Dr. Leo TROY, Dr. Stan Hall, Dr. Ernst U. Monse, Dr. Hugh Thompson, Dr. Irwin Rothberg, Dr. Daniel Wilhoft and Dr. Irwin Primer, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
RUTGERS, The State University, Defendant-Respondent.
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued February 14, 2001.
Decided June 20, 2001.
Michael H. Sussman, a member of the New York bar, Goshen, NY, argued the cause for appellants (John P. Brennan, Jr., attorney).
John J. Peirano, Jr., Newark, argued the cause for respondent (Carpenter, Bennett & Morrissey, attorneys; Mr. Peirano, Kevin C. Donovan and Seth Ptasiewicz, on…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.