Legal Opinion

Sloan v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance

District Court, D. North Dakota

Decided May 31, 2006No. 1:05-mj-00014PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER FOR JUDGMENT

HOVLAND, Chief Judge.

A bench trial in this matter was scheduled to commence on Friday, January 13, 2006, in Bismarck, North Dakota. The parties opted to forego a bench trial in favor of proceeding to trial on the briefs and a stipulated fact record. The stipulated record consists of the “administrative record.” See Docket No. 15, Exhibit No. 28. No testimony was offered.

I. MOTION FOR INTRODUCTION OF ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE

In addition to the administrative record, the plaintiff, Claud Sloan, seeks to admit additional evidence as set forth…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Connie M. Miller v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  3. Doyle v. Paul Revere Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  4. Doloros Donatelli v. The Home Insurance Company, Cooper Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  5. Brown v. Seitz Foods, Inc. Disability Benefit PlanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Michael Avenoso v. Reliance Standard Life Ins CoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
  2. Claud Sloan v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  3. Avenoso v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2021
  4. Claud Sloan v. Hartford LifeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  5. Verschelden v. The Hartford Life and Accident Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API