Marriage of Erickson v. Erickson

OPINION

FOLEY, Judge.

This is before the court on appeal from an amended judgment. The trial court awarded the respondent an increase of child support, and found the appellant in contempt for failure to provide insurance as required by the divorce decree.

We affirm in part and remand for entry of the proper child support amount pursuant to the guidelines.

FACTS

The parties’ marriage was dissolved in 1978. The respondent was granted custody of their three minor children. The appellant was ordered to provide health insurance and $355,000 of life insurance for the children’s benefit, and to pay $900…