Legal Opinion

United States v. Victor Manuel Manta-Carillo

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided October 4, 2012No. 11-15976UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Victor Manuel Manta-Carillo appeals the district court’s denial of his suppression motion arguing that the government violated his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination when it failed to read him the warnings set out in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). The district court denied his motion to suppress on the ground that the circumstances surrounding Manta-Carillo’s statements did not rise to the level of custodial interrogation and, thus, did not implicate Miranda. Thereafter, Manta-Carillo and the government entered into a stipulation of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. United States v. PataneSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. United States v. JerniganCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
  5. United States v. MoyaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Chaidez-ReyesDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API