Legal Opinion
In Re Sturm
California Supreme Court
Decided April 18, 1974No. Crim. 16799PublishedCited by 111 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WRIGHT, C. J.
J.We issued an order to show cause in response to the application of Robert Sturm for a writ of habeas corpus on allegations that the Adult Authority (Authority) denied petitioner due process of law in that it acted irresponsibly in first denying him parole and then refusing to communicate to him the reasons for the denial. We conclude that there has been a denial of due process. As the petitioner is presently on parole, the order to show cause is discharged and the petition for the writ is denied.
Almost a quarter century ago, petitioner and James McKay, who were then…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Jones v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by111 opinions
- Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- In Re RosenkrantzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. Chi Ko WongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. RamirezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- In Re DannenbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.