Wymard v. McCloskey & Co.

WOOD, District Judge.. , „ ,, _ . ^ bave .^fore the Court an action by he ?ecefers of a bankrupt painting contractor to recover money allegedly , ,, _ _ , , r, T , °wed by th® McC oskey and Co Inc., to Ke“mel and C+1” * or Painting work Performed by the bankrupt on a housing frof G* Meade’ Mary‘

The gist of the action concerns whether this work was performed on a cost-plus basis after great difficulties were encountered by Kemmel in the course of the contract.

We make the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law:

1. Kemmel is a painting contractor incorporated and existing under the…