Legal Opinion

Wymard v. McCloskey & Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 22, 1960No. Civ. A. No. 28147PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD, District Judge.

This is a suit on a contract for money due and owing Kemmel & Co., Inc. by McCloskey & Co., Inc.1 The plaintiffs are the receivers of Kemmel, having been appointed by the Court on March 2, 1960. It appears that the primary cause of the bankruptcy of Kemmel has been the defendant’s refusal to pay Kemmel the alleged debt.

The defendant has moved to stay this suit pending the outcome of certain arbitration procedures provided for in the contract between the parties: According to the contract, plaintiffs may not resort to the courts until the arbitration procedures have been…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. N. L. Wymard and George L. Stark, Receivers of Kemmel & Co., Inc., Debtor v. McCloskey & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
  2. W. R. Ferguson, Inc. of New Jersey v. William A. Berbusse, Jr., Inc. of New YorkSuperior Court of Delaware · 1966
  3. Wymard v. McCloskey & Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Shook of West Virginia, Inc. v. York City Sewer AuthorityDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Beacon Construction Co. of Massachusetts, Inc. v. Prepakt Concrete Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API