Legal Opinion
White Mountain Apache Tribe of Arizona v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided November 4, 1993No. 22-HPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NETTESHEIM, Judge.
This matter is before the court after argument on Israel S. Weissbrodt’s motion filed August 19, 1992, on behalf of the now dissolved firm of Weissbrodt & Weissbrodt (referred to collectively as the “associated attorneys”), for reimbursement of attorneys’ fees and expenses. Mr. Weissbrodt, former attorney of record for the White Mountain Apache Tribe (“the Tribe”), moves pursuant to General Order No. 4, Dec. 20,1982 (Indian Claims Commission Act of August 13, 1946, 60 Stat. 1053 § 15, as amended, 25 U.S.C. § 70n (1976) (omitted from Code pursuant to Commission…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Nathaniel Saxton, by and Through His Legal Representatives, Steven and Candace Saxton v. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Callen v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. BeebeSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Applegate v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Rose Acre Farms, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Swisher v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2003
- Weissbrodt v. White Mountain Apache Tribe of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994