Legal Opinion

Hannick v. Kelly Temporary Services

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 22, 1993No. 63162PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRIST, Judge.

Donald Hanniek (Claimant) was injured in the course of his employment with Kelly Temporary Services (Employer). He appeals the denial of benefits based on his failure to meet the notice requirements of § 287.420, RSMo 1986. We reverse and remand.

During the week of April 28,1991, Claimant was doing work for Employer at a business called Weber Costello. His duties required him to lift thirty- to forty-pound wooden pallets from stacks and move them to a pile to be burned. The pallets were stacked from two- to five-feet high. Claimant burned pallets all day the last three days he…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ford v. Bi-State Development AgencyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Klopstein v. Schroll House Moving Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Dillon v. General MotorsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Pattengill v. General Motors Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Lawson v. Vendo Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hampton v. Big Boy Steel ErectionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  2. Soos v. Mallinckrodt Chemical Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Gander v. Shelby CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Seyler v. Spirtas IndustrialMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Aramark Educational Services, Inc. v. FaulknerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API