Legal Opinion

Seyler v. Spirtas Industrial

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 9, 1998No. 73131PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AHRENS, Presiding Judge.

Employer, Spirtas Industrial, appeals from the order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission granting the claimant, Daniel Seyler, a temporary total disability award. Employer contends on appeal that the claimant failed to prove that his failure to provide employer with timely notice did not prejudice it. We reverse and remand.

Reviewing the record in the light most favorable to the Commission’s findings, the following evidence was adduced below. Claimant was working as a high-lift operator for employer in December 1995. On December 11, 1995, the teeth of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Klopstein v. Schroll House Moving Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Willis v. Jewish HospitalMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Dunn v. Hussman Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Hannick v. Kelly Temporary ServicesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hampton v. Big Boy Steel ErectionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  2. Soos v. Mallinckrodt Chemical Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Aramark Educational Services, Inc. v. FaulknerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API