Legal Opinion

United States v. Salvatore Finazzo, Dominic J. Licavoli

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 28, 1978No. 77-5186PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRITT, Circuit Judge.

Under the 1968 eavesdropping statute,1 the FBI secured an interception order from a federal judge, and on the basis of incriminating evidence obtained from overhearing the defendant Finazzo’s conversations at his office, the government charged him with a federal offense. The government appeals from a decision by Judge Damon Keith suppressing all the evidence obtained from electronic eavesdropping devices which FBI agents secretly installed by breaking into Finazzo’s offices. We affirm the suppression order. We hold that judges do not have the power under the 1968…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Dalia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. City of Seattle v. McCreadyWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. United States v. Alejandrina TorresCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  4. United States v. Dave Feldman, Richard Zalmanowski, and Kenneth BakerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
  5. United States v. Ramon Rodriguez and Michael ButtigiegCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API