Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Robinson, Pros. Atty. v. Crow

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 3, 1947No. 4-8126PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McHaney, Justice.

Appellant, as prosecuting attorney for the 6th judicial circuit, brought this action against appellees, who are the State Board of Chiropractic Examiners, to enjoin them from issuing licenses by reciprocity to applicants to practice chiropractic without requiring such applicants to present to them a certificate of ability in the basic sciences issued by the State Board of Examiners in the basic sciences, as, it is contended, is required by the Basic Sciences Act, No. 147 of 1929, §§ 10795 et seq., of Pope’s Digest.

The complaint alleged that appellees “have for many months…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ritholz v. Arkansas State Board of OptometrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
  2. Melton v. CarterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
  3. Smith v. HammSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
  4. Stroud v. CrowSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Arkansas State Board of Architects v. ClarkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
  2. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API