Legal Opinion

Smith v. Hamm

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 26, 1944No. 4-7401PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnox, J.

Ill feeling has developed between appellants and appellees, who reside next door to each other. At different times various members of the appellee clan have addressed opprobrious language to various members of the appellant family. While the scene of these exchanges is not definitely alleged, it may be inferred that appellees gave vent to their feeling from the vantage point of their own premises, while the persons addressed were on property which was appellants’ home. The question presented by this appeal is whether equity should restrain appellees from further molesting appellants. The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re DebsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Davis & Farnum Manufacturing Co. v. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. State v. VaughanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  4. Mackenzie v. Frank M. Pauli Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Lyric Theater v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bates v. BatesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  2. Webber v. GraySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
  3. Arkansas State Board of Architects v. ClarkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
  4. Maxwell v. SuttonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1981
  5. Wunderlich v. CatesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API