Legal Opinion

Muti v. Hoey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 4, 1927PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

The action is brought under the act of Congress of June 5, 1920, known as the Merchant Marine Act of 1920, or the Jones Act, to recover damages resulting from the negligence of the defendants in causing the death of plaintiff’s intestate. The defendants are stevedores and, at the time of the accident in question, on January 12, 1927, plaintiff’s intestate was in their employ and was engaged upon the steamship Primero at pier 39, East river, Brooklyn, N. Y., in defendants’ work of unloading the cargo from said steamship, and, while so engaged, a part of the cargo, consisting of an automobile…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. International Stevedoring Co. v. HavertySupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Clark v. Montezuma Transportation Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  3. Resigno v. F. Jarka Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. The Hanna NielsenDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1928
  2. Mahoney v. International Elevating Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1927
  3. Resigno v. Jarka Co., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  4. Rucker v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  5. Rucker v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API