Legal Opinion · Concurrence
Resigno v. Jarka Co., Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 29, 1928Published
1ConcurrenceCrane, J.
A motion was made by the defendant, F. Jarka Co., Inc., under rule 107, subdivision 2, of the Rules of Practice, for judgment on the pleading dismissing the complaint upon the ground that the court did not have jurisdiction of the subject of the action. The motion was granted and the judgment of dismissal has been affirmed by the Appellate Division, one of the justices dissenting.
The complaint alleges that the defendant, F. Jarka Co., Inc., is and was a foreign corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of New Jersey, maintaining an office for the regular transaction…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Panama Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Western Fuel Co. v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Atlantic Transport Co. of W. Va. v. ImbrovekSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Washington v. W. C. Dawson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Cunard Steamship Co. v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.