Legal Opinion

Mizell v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 24, 1984No. 22088PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harwell, Justice:

This appeal arises out of a workers’ compensation award of death benefits. We affirm.

The primary issue on appeal is whether the $40,000 limit on workers’ compensation awards found in Code § 42-9-100 (1976) applies. We hold that the limit does not apply.

Respondent Vivian B. Mizell’s deceased husband was employed by appellant Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. for 34 years. He began to experience respiratory problems, and his last day of employment was July 15,1977. On May 19,1978 the legislature repealed Code § 42-9-100. Mr. Mizell subsequently died on February 22,1979. On May 2,1979…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Booker v. Duke Medical CenterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Lark v. Bi-Lo, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  3. Sizemore v. State Workmen's Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Carter v. Penney Tire and Recapping Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
  5. Glenn v. Columbia Silica Sand Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Georgetown SteelSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  2. Brown v. Greenwood Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  3. Hanks v. Blair Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  4. Bright v. Orr-Lyons MillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  5. Corbett v. City of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API