Mizell v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Harwell, Justice:
This appeal arises out of a workers’ compensation award of death benefits. We affirm.
The primary issue on appeal is whether the $40,000 limit on workers’ compensation awards found in Code § 42-9-100 (1976) applies. We hold that the limit does not apply.
Respondent Vivian B. Mizell’s deceased husband was employed by appellant Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. for 34 years. He began to experience respiratory problems, and his last day of employment was July 15,1977. On May 19,1978 the legislature repealed Code § 42-9-100. Mr. Mizell subsequently died on February 22,1979. On May 2,1979…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Booker v. Duke Medical CenterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Lark v. Bi-Lo, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
- Sizemore v. State Workmen's Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1975
- Carter v. Penney Tire and Recapping Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
- Glenn v. Columbia Silica Sand Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Parsons v. Georgetown SteelSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
- Brown v. Greenwood Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
- Hanks v. Blair Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
- Bright v. Orr-Lyons MillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
- Corbett v. City of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.