Legal Opinion

Nuss v. Alexander

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 2005No. S-03-1084PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnolly, J.

Ray D. Nuss and Sandra Fox, the special administrators and personal representatives for the estate of Curtis M. Nuss (appellants), appeal the district court’s order dismissing part of their lawsuit against Eugene M. Alexander’s estate as time barred. The remainder of the suit was tried, and the court found for the appellants. Annabelle D. Alexander, the personal representative of Eugene Alexander’s estate (appellee), cross-appeals, arguing that the entire action was time barred. We conclude that the entire action was time barred and affirm in part, and in part reverse and remand with…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Colton v. DeweyNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Reinke Manufacturing Co. v. HayesNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Giese v. SticeNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Manker v. MankerNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Schendt v. DeweyNebraska Supreme Court · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Churchill v. Columbus Comm. Hosp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Harris v. OMAHA HOUSING AUTHORITYNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Buttercase v. DavisNebraska Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Konecne v. Abram, LLCNebraska Supreme Court · 2025
  5. Steen v. MurrayDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API