Legal Opinion

HOCH v. CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 13, 2021No. 5:19-cv-03220Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA BRANNDON W. HOCH, : CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff, : : v. : No. 19-3220 : CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY : CORPORATION : Defendant. : MEMORANDUM Plaintiff Branndon Hoch brought this action against Defendant Carpenter Technology Corporation, alleging Carpenter terminated his employment because of his epilepsy, in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Mr. Hoch tried his claim to this Court on July 12 and 13, 2021. This Memorandum constitutes our findings of fact and conclusions of law for purposes of Federal Rule of Civil…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Luis A. Fuentes v. Steven P. Perskie, Chairman of the New Jersey Casino Control Commission the New Jersey Casino Control CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  3. Kolstad v. American Dental Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Mary Burton v. Teleflex IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  5. James W. Woodson v. Scott Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API