Legal Opinion

Herness v. McCann

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1931No. 6,771PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matthews

The defendants, James A. McCann and Florian B. McCann, have appealed from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, Louis Herness, entered in an action for damages for destruction of crops by trespassing cattle. The complaint included Eva L. McCann, wife of James A. McCann, as a party defendant with her husband and son, but at the trial the action was dismissed as to her, by reason of the fact that allegations of conspiracy were not sustained.

The complaint alleges that the defendants wilfully and maliciously drove cattle, in which they were jointly interested, upon the lands of plaintiff where they…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Herrin v. SiebenMontana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Monroe v. CannonMontana Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Musselshell Cattle Co. v. WoolfolkMontana Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Schreiner v. Deep Creek Stock Ass'nMontana Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Chilcott v. ReaMontana Supreme Court · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Thompson v. MattuschekMontana Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Dunbar v. EmighMontana Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Griffin Grocery Co. v. Carson Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API