State v. Brown
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Appellant contends that since the trial court had authority to order production of the incident report and CMC had an adequate remedy at law, the court of appeals erred in issuing the writ of prohibition. We agree.
In State, ex rel. Celebrezze, v. Butler Cty. Common Pleas Court *195(1979), 60 Ohio St. 2d 188, 189, 14 O.O. 3d 441, 398 N.E. 2d 777, 778, we stated: “The three requirements which must exist to support the issuance of a writ of prohibition are: (1) the court or officer against whom it is sought must be about to exercise judicial or quasi-judicial power, (2) the exercise of such power…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State ex rel. Staton v. Common Pleas CourtOhio Supreme Court · 1965
- State ex rel. Stefanick v. Municipal Court of MariettaOhio Supreme Court · 1970
- State ex rel. Celebrezze v. Court of Common Pleas of Butler CountyOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- State ex rel. Whitney v. McClainOhio Supreme Court · 1977
3Cited by10 opinions
- State ex rel. Abner v. ElliottOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- State ex rel. Butler County Children Services Board v. SageOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corp. v. Eighth Judicial DistrictNevada Supreme Court · 1997
- State ex rel. Herdman v. WatsonOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Rath v. WilliamsonOhio Supreme Court · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.