Legal Opinion

Hill v. City of Clovis

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 28, 2000No. F032045PublishedCited by 15 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BUCKLEY, J.

This is the third appeal arising out of a dispute over developer fees and obligations between appellant N. T. Hill (Hill) and respondent City of Clovis (Clovis). Developers Insurance Company (Developers), which issued the construction bond in this case, is also a party to the appeal. The two prior appeals (Nos. F025972 and F026809) were dismissed on procedural grounds on April 21, 1998.

Statement of Facts and Earlier Procedural History 1

On February 5, 1990, Clovis entered into a “Subdivision Agreement” for tract No. 4154 with subdivider William R. Tatham, Jr. In relevant…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Morehart v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Great Lakes Properties, Inc. v. City of El SegundoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Cossack v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Youngblood v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Leroy T. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Gardner v. County of SonomaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Wang v. Massey ChevroletCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. County of Imperial v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. Colony Cove Properties, LLC v. City of CarsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. County of Imperial v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API