United States v. Hernandez
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
ROBERT E. Quinn, Chief Judge:
A board of review reversed the accused’s conviction for rape because of error in the admission of a pretrial statement by the accused. The Judge Advocate General of the Army has asked this Court to review the legal correctness of the board’s decision. In addition, we granted the accused’s petition for review to consider a number of issues raised by him.
On April 17, 1953, Miss Marga Forster, the complaining witness, was at the Bahnhof Cafe, Kirchheim-bolanden, Germany, in the company of a Mr. Anton Krivda, the accused, and another girl. Miss…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stein v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United States v. SellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
- United States v. MongeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
- United States v. FisherUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- United States v. JoseyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- United States v. BuntingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
- United States v. TrojanowskiUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- United States v. MorenoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
- United States v. BrownUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
- United States v. RoganUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.