Legal Opinion

Central Bank and Trust Company v. Robinson

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 26, 1958No. 18062PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hall

In the trial court plaintiff in error was one of three defendants, and defendants in error were plaintiffs. In this opinion we refer to the defendants in error as plaintiffs, and to the plaintiff in error as the Bank, and to Neilsen and Newton, defendants below, by name.

On February 7, 1955, plaintiffs commenced this action, naming as defendants Silas M. Newton, Charles C. Neilsen and Central Bank and Trust Company. By their complaint the plaintiffs seek to recover from the defend ants, pursuant to provisions of The Federal Securities Act of 1933 and The Securities Law of Colorado, the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. C. M. Joiner Leasing Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Ralston Purina Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Schlemmer v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburg Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. Parrish v. De RemerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
  5. Morlan v. Durland Trust Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lowery v. Ford Hill Investment Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  2. Witcher v. Canon CitySupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  3. People v. MorrowColorado Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Rogerson v. RuddSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  5. Lowery v. Ford Hill Investment Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API