Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Hylo v. Michigan Surety Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1948No. Docket No. 39, Calendar No. 44,191PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyles, J.

The plaintiff, Josephine Hylo, brought this suit against the defendant Michigan Surety Company to recover damages claimed to have been suffered by reason of the wrongful killing of her father, Martin Hylo, October 7, 1944, by an automobile driven by one Virgil Wright while Wright was in an intoxicated condition. It is conceded that Wright was intoxicated at the time of the accident, that he negligently operated his automobile on the wrong side of a public highway, ran into and injured Martin Hylo causing his death. The defendant surety company is the surety on the statutory bonds of two…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Flower v. WitkovskyMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Clinton v. LaningMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Eddy v. CourtrightMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Heikkala v. IsaacsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Butzin v. BonkMichigan Supreme Court · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wendelin v. RussellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  2. Village of Brooten, a Municipal Corporation v. Cudahy Packing Company, a Corporation, and the Travelers Indemnity Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
  3. LaBlue v. SpeckerMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Duncan v. BeresMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. Mason v. LovinsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API