Legal Opinion

Reale Investment, Inc. v. City of Colorado Springs

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided June 24, 1993No. 92CA0889PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge MARQUEZ.

In this action for inverse condemnation, plaintiff, Reale Investments, Inc. (Reale), appeals the trial court’s dismissal of its case on the basis that it was premature. Defendant, City of Colorado Springs, cross-appeals certain findings of the trial court as well as that portion of a summary judgment ruling that Reale had no reasonable use of the entire parcel of property. We dismiss the claim for inverse condemnation and vacate the summary judgment entered on Reale’s behalf.

As part of a planned larger development, Reale, in May 1988, purchased an irregularly shaped…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. MacDonald, Sommer & Frates v. Yolo CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Jafay v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  4. Applebaugh v. Board of County CommissionersColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Cottonwood Farms v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. SK Finance SA v. La Plata County, Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  2. Williams v. City of CentralColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Board of County Commissioners v. Kraft Building ContractorsColorado Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Wilkinson v. Board of County CommissionersColorado Court of Appeals · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API