In re Z.S.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtGorman, J.
[¶ 1] The mother of Z.S. appeals from an order entered in the District Court (Portland, Goranites, J.) finding that the child is in circumstances of jeopardy. The mother contends that there was insufficient evidence to support the court’s finding of jeopardy, and that the court erred by ordering the Department of Health and Human Services to approve vaccinations for the child against the mother’s wishes. We disagree and affirm.
*1287I. BACKGROUND
[¶ 2] In an order dated October 1, 2014, the court found, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the mother placed the child in circumstances of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- In re B.C.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
- In Re Johnna M.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
- In Re Matthew W.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
- Hinkley v. HinkleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re Corey T.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
- In re Corey T.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
- In re Kaliyah B.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
- Michelle L. Seymour v. Joshua J. SeymourSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2021
- In Re Children of Krystal W.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2025
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.