Legal Opinion

In re B.C.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 20, 2012PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGorman, J.

[¶ 1] The mother of B.C. appeals from a jeopardy order entered in the District Court (Lewiston, Beliveau, J.) following a testimonial hearing. The mother contends that the court erred in terminating the Department of Health and Human Services’s reunification obligations and in improperly excluding evidence at the hearing. We affirm the judgment.

I. BACKGROUND

[¶ 2] The court found the following facts, which are supported by competent record evidence, by a preponderance of the evidence. See 22 M.R.S. § 4035(2) (2012); In re Destiny T., 2009 ME 26, ¶ 14, 965 A.2d 872. The Department has been…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In re Doris G.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
  2. In Re David H.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
  3. In Re Jamara R.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
  4. In Re Johnna M.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
  5. In Re Matthew W.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. In re B.P.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
  2. In re Child of Nicholas P.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019
  3. In re E.A.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
  4. In re Hope H.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
  5. In re Hope H.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API