Cuda v. Cuda
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from an amended order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Anthony F. Shaheen, J.), entered July 1, 2004. The amended order, among other things, adjudged that defendant’s retirement benefits, to the extent they accrued during the marriage, are marital property.
It is hereby ordered that the amended order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: We note at the outset that defendant appeals from an amended qualified domestic relations order (QDRO) and that no appeal lies as of right from a QDRO. Nevertheless, we treat the notice of appeal…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Majauskas v. MajauskasNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- De Gaust v. De GaustAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- McWade v. McWadeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Irato v. IratoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Gartley v. GartleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Gentile v. GentileAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Elwell v. ElwellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- ANDRESS, KATHLEEN E. v. ANDRESS, TERRANCE A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Flores v. FloresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Kennelty v. KenneltyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.