Legal Opinion
United States v. Honorable Jim R. Carrigan, and Peter Kiewit Sons' Company, Harold L. Cherry, and Richard L. McVaney Parties in Interest-Respondents
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 7, 1986No. 86-2152PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOGAN, Circuit Judge.
This is a petition for a writ of mandamus seeking vacation of a pretrial order directing that defendants in a criminal action be allowed to depose particular prospective government witnesses. In the underlying criminal action, a mail fraud case brought against defendants Peter Kiewit Sons’ Co., Harold L. Cherry, and Richard L. McVaney in connection with a federally-funded bridge construction project, several government witnesses refused defense requests to interview them. Alleging that the witnesses’ refusal was the result of government prosecutors’ interference with…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Will v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Clifton Gregory v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- United States v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- In Re Cooper Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. SkillingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Tony Ray Wicker and Vickie SilerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Smith v. Northwest Financial Acceptance, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.