Legal Opinion
Tardiff v. Knox County
District Court, D. Maine
Decided July 29, 2008No. Civil 07-10-P-HPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT PART I: GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON THE DEFENDANTS’ AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES AND COUNTERCLAIMS, BUT DENYING IT WITH REGARD TO THE PRECLUSIVE EFFECTS OF THE PRIOR CLASS ACTION LITIGATION
D. BROCK HORNBY, District Judge.
In February 2001, the plaintiff was arrested for witness tampering and taken to the Knox County Jail. There, a corrections officer performed a strip and visual body cavity search. The plaintiffs claim against Knox County for violation of her constitutional rights proceeded initially as part of a class action, with the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Taylor v. SturgellSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re Heartland Payment Systems, Inc. Customer Data Security Breach LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2012
- Darney Ex Rel. K.D. v. Dragon Products Co.District Court, D. Maine · 2009
- Morris v. Affinity Health Plan, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013