Legal Opinion

Titus v. Scantling

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1834PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from the Shelby Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtStevens, J.

Scantling and wife, plaintiffs in the Court bellow, declared against Titus, the defendant below, upon a bond made to the wife while sole for the payment of 1,000 dollars, conditioned for the performance of an award, &c. The declaration, after stating the bond and condition, alleges the making of the award, &c. and that certain sums of money were awarded to be paid to the wife, she still being sole, by the defendant, &c. of which he had notice, &c. It is then specially averred, that the plaintiffs in all things kept and performed the award on their parts, but that the defendant had failed to…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pearsall v. DwightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1806
  2. Desesbats v. BerquierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1808
  3. Walker v. MaxwellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1804

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nelson v. United StatesUnited States Circuit Court · 1887
  2. Lessee of M'Laughlin v. MayburySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1808

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API