Legal Opinion
Zee Toys, Inc. v. County of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 25, 1978No. Docket Nos. 52977, 53695, 53306PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
POTTER, Acting P. J.
These consolidated appeals are from summary judgments in two superior court actions which grant plaintiffs Zee Toys, Inc., and Formosa Plastics Group (U.S.A.), Inc. (Sup. Ct. No. C 179151) and Sears, Roebuck and Co. (Sup.Ct. No. C 191156) refunds of ad valorem taxes paid under protest. In the Zee case, the taxes had been collected for the benefit of defendants County of Los Angeles and City of Long Beach; in the Sears case, the taxes had been collected for the benefit of defendants County of Los Angeles and City of Compton, the city in each case being the situs of…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Star-Kist Foods, Inc. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Chico Feminist Women's Health Center v. Butte Glenn Medical SocietyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1983
- McKeon v. Hastings College of the LawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Kawasaki Motors Corp. v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Cornblum v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.