Legal Opinion

Megan Roake v. Maxwell Delman

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 13, 2016No. 73337-1-IPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpearman, J.

¶1 — The Sexual Assault Protection Order (SAPO) Act, chapter 7.90 ROW, establishes a special proceeding for a victim of sexual assault to obtain a civil protection order. Megan Roake filed a petition for a protection order under the SAPO Act. The trial court found that Roake failed to establish reasonable fear and dismissed. Because the proceeding was procedurally irregular and rested on an erroneous interpretation of the SAPO Act, we reverse and remand.

FACTS

¶2 Roake and Maxwell Delman had a sexual encounter and dispute whether it was consensual. Several months after the encounter, Roake…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. J.P.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Davis v. Department of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Lake v. Woodcreek Homeowners Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 2010

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rebecca Nelson v. James DuvallCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  2. Roake v. DelmanWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Roake v. DelmanWashington Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API