Legal Opinion

United States v. Kershaw

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided May 31, 1988No. ACMR 8601500PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

DeFORD, Senior Judge:

Tried by a military judge sitting as general court-martial at Seoul, Korea, appellant was convicted, contrary to his pleas, of violating a general regulation and obtaining services by false pretenses in violation of Articles 92 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 892 and 934 (1982). His sentence to a dishonorable discharge, confinement for two years, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction to Private E-l was approved by the convening authority.

On appeal, as he did at trial, appellant asserts that the charges must be…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. HonicanU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API